Let me go into more detail here. I dislike mechanics, or ‘cold science’ because it fails to capture the human experience. Just think of the experience of compassion or of conciousness or of love. These very common human experiences aren’t captured at all by the science involved. So naturally I’ve found myself leaning towards mysticism.
The problem is that mysticism starts to have it’s own set of rules. I still like Zen meditation, “mindfulness,” and look back over my blog and I remember I’ve been doing it heavily since late 2004. Everything else becomes a dogma in itself (even mindfulness can become a dogma), so I’ve tried to tread the water of accepting “every religion” insomuch as it provides a connection with the “Divine,” and it has been fun.
However, I was unable to see outside the Dichotomy of mysticism or mechanics. The benefit of me reading and now digesting a solid week of Reich is he provides another alternative, and I like it better. “Fuctionalism,” Reich’s system, is a process ontology, i.e. the truth of things are found in their changing over time.
I like what he said about flying a plane. The truth for the flyer is what allows him to fly and land safely and get where he wanted to go. Mystics would say it’s intuition and his “destiny” to fly the plane, or a loose mystic like me might have said it’s because Divine Providence gave him the brains and opportunity to learn to fly. Mechnical scientists could build the instruments and even dissect his body and examine the muscle systems and the brain that the flyer employed, but the more we break it down that way, the less of a flyer we have. The truth comes in the constant experience of flying the plane.
Back to what I began with. Scientists fail to capture the experience of love when they talk about the chemicals involved in the human physiology. Likewise, compassion and conciousness are difficult to explain with scientific models. Mystics get to shrug and smile, enjoying the experience, while saying, “God made it this way, compassion and love are a reflection of the Divine,” but never take the responsibility and the entirity of the experience as their own. Ultimately, I am the one loving or being compassionate. And in their own ways, both mysticism and mechanistics fail to capture that truth.